Seatext library / BotRefund evidence
How to Tell If a Privacy Tool Is Blocking Your Bot Detection Script
Privacy tools such as ad blockers, tracker blockers, and hardened browsers can strip or block the network requests that bot detection scripts rely on. The fastest way to confirm interference is to open the...
✓ Built for advertisers who need clear, refund-ready traffic evidence.
How privacy tools interfere with bot detection
Bot detection scripts typically load from a third-party domain and send browser fingerprint data — canvas hashes, font lists, WebGL parameters, timing metrics — back to an analysis endpoint. Privacy extensions treat those requests as tracking and either cancel the network call or strip the response. The result is a silent failure: the script never initializes, or it initializes but returns empty data, so your backend receives no signal for that visitor.
BotRefund’s detection suite runs 106 independent checks, including an Empty Font Canvas test that compares the fonts a browser reports against the fonts it can actually render. When a privacy tool blocks the script that performs this check, the signal simply disappears from the evidence set. BotRefund treats each signal as evidence, not a verdict, and cross-checks it against network, device, and behavior data. If one signal is missing, the model weighs the remaining 105 checks instead of defaulting to a block.
Common signs your bot detection is being blocked
- Console errors:
net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT,Content Security Policyviolations, orFailed to load resourcefor your detection domain. - Network tab: Requests to the detection endpoint show
(canceled),blocked, or return 0 bytes with no response body. - Missing fingerprint data: Your analytics show
nullor default values for canvas hash, font list, WebGL vendor, or audio context — fields that are normally populated. - Sudden drop in detection rate: A spike in “unknown” or “unclassified” visits correlates with a browser update or a popular privacy extension release.
- User reports: Legitimate visitors on hardened browsers (Brave, Firefox with uBlock Origin, Safari with ITP) complain about CAPTCHAs or blocked content.
Step-by-step diagnostic sequence
- Open DevTools in an affected browser. Use the same browser and extension configuration your visitors use. Disable your own extensions temporarily to establish a baseline.
- Load a page that includes the bot detection script. Watch the Network tab filtered to the detection domain (e.g.,
*.botrefund.comor your custom endpoint). - Check request status. A healthy request returns
200 OKwith a JSON payload or a small script. A blocked request showsblocked:other,canceled, or no entry at all. - Inspect the Console tab. Filter for errors from the detection domain. Look for
Refused to load the script,Blocked by Content Security Policy, or extension-specific messages likeuBlock Origin blocked. - Verify fingerprint output. If the script loads, call its debug endpoint (many providers expose
window.BotRefund.getSignals()or similar). Confirm that canvas, font, WebGL, and audio signals are present and non-empty. - Test with the privacy tool enabled. Re-enable the extension, reload, and repeat steps 2–5. Compare the signal set. Missing signals = interference.
- Document the extension and rule. Most blockers log the filter list that triggered the block (e.g., EasyPrivacy, Fanboy’s Annoyances). Note the list and rule ID for reporting or allow-listing.
Key facts
| Fact | Detail |
|---|---|
| Detection signals used | 106 independent checks including Empty Font Canvas, hardware/GPU fingerprinting, suspicious ports, mouse dynamics, click behavior, session patterns |
| Signal philosophy | Each signal is evidence, not a verdict; cross-checked across browser, network, device, and behavior layers |
| Accuracy claim | 99% bot vs. human classification via AI model that weighs the complete pattern |
| Privacy-tool impact | Privacy tools, travel, corporate networks, and unusual devices can produce unexpected behavior for genuine people |
| Setup time | About one minute to add to a website; no credit card required for free audit |
| Refund scope | Recovers bot-click refunds from Google and Meta ad spend dating back to 2017 |
| Ad budget loss estimate | Bot clicks steal up to 20% of Google and Meta ad budget |
Limitations and when this diagnostic does not apply
- First-party vs. third-party loading: If your detection script is bundled into your main JavaScript bundle and served from your own domain, most privacy tools will not block it. The diagnostic above applies to third-party endpoints.
- Server-side detection: Some signals (IP reputation, TLS fingerprint, HTTP header order) are collected server-side and cannot be blocked by client-side privacy tools. This diagnostic only covers client-side fingerprinting.
- Extension updates: Filter lists change daily. A script that works today may be blocked tomorrow. Re-run the diagnostic after major browser or extension updates.
- Enterprise / managed devices: Corporate proxies and endpoint security agents can strip scripts before they reach the browser. DevTools will show a clean network tab, but the script never arrives. Check with IT for proxy logs.
- False positives: A missing signal does not equal a bot. Legitimate users on privacy-focused configurations will have incomplete fingerprints. BotRefund’s model accounts for this by requiring corroboration across multiple signals.
Choosing a more resilient detection approach
If privacy tools routinely block your current script, consider these architectural changes:
- First-party proxy: Route detection requests through a subdomain on your own domain (e.g.,
metrics.yoursite.com) that forwards to the detection vendor. Most blockers allow same-origin requests. - Bundled fingerprinting: Include the fingerprinting logic in your main app bundle so it loads with your application code. This increases payload size but avoids third-party blocking.
- Server-side enrichment: Collect whatever client-side signals you can, then enrich with server-side data (IP intelligence, behavioral heuristics, session replay) that cannot be blocked.
- Graceful degradation: Design your backend to make decisions with partial signals. If canvas is missing but mouse dynamics and network signals are present, the model can still classify with high confidence.
Frequently asked questions
Why does my bot detection work in Chrome but fail in Brave?
Brave shields block third-party fingerprinting scripts by default. The script loads but its network requests are canceled. Check Brave’s shield panel for “Scripts blocked” and add an exception for your detection domain, or use a first-party proxy.
Can I detect that a privacy tool is active without loading my script?
Not reliably. Some sites probe for known extension IDs or test for blocked resources (e.g., loading a known tracking pixel), but modern extensions hide their presence. The only dependable signal is the absence of your own script’s expected output.
Does blocking the bot detection script mean the visitor is a bot?
No. Privacy-conscious humans use blockers. Legitimate corporate networks strip scripts. Treat missing signals as missing evidence, not negative evidence. BotRefund’s AI weighs the complete pattern across 106 checks rather than relying on any single signal.
How often should I re-run this diagnostic?
After any major browser release (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge quarterly), after extension filter list updates (EasyPrivacy updates weekly), and when you see a sustained drop in detection coverage in your analytics.
What is the performance cost of a first-party proxy?
One additional DNS lookup and TLS handshake on the first request, then connection reuse. Typical overhead is 20–50 ms. The detection payload itself is usually under 5 KB gzipped.
Can I allow-list my detection script in popular blocklists?
You can submit a request to EasyList/EasyPrivacy maintainers, but acceptance is not guaranteed and takes weeks. A first-party proxy is faster and under your control.
Does BotRefund’s free audit show which signals are being blocked?
Yes. The free bot audit runs a live scan of your site and reports which of the 106 signals fired, which were missing, and why — including privacy-tool interference. It takes about one minute to set up with no credit card.
Further reading and comparison sources
These external sources provide additional context for evaluating the topic. Their inclusion is not an endorsement.
Learn more
Visit the website for more information.