Seatext library / BotRefund evidence
How to Tell If Your Corporate Network Traffic Handling Is Actually Stopping Bots
You know your bot mitigation is working when origin server load drops, API response times improve, analytics show fewer suspicious sessions, and failed login rates stabilize — all without losing legitimate conversions. The proof...
✓ Built for advertisers who need clear, refund-ready traffic evidence.
You can tell your bot handling is working when your origin server load drops, your API response times improve, your analytics show a decrease in suspicious sessions, and your failed login rate stabilizes, all without a drop in legitimate user conversions. Those outcomes appear when detection signals from the browser, the network, the device, and user behavior agree with each other. A single anomaly — like a missing font or a fast click — is not a verdict; it becomes evidence only when cross‑checked against independent signals.
What "working" looks like in practice
Effective bot mitigation shows up in operational metrics before it shows up in a dashboard badge. Watch for these changes:
- Origin server load decreases because automated traffic never reaches your application tier.
- API response times improve as request queues shrink.
- Analytics suspicious-session count falls — sessions with no mouse movement, no scrolling, or superhuman input speed disappear.
- Failed login rate stabilizes at a low baseline instead of spiking during credential‑stuffing waves.
- Legitimate conversion rate holds steady or rises, confirming real users are not being blocked.
If all five move in the right direction together, your traffic handling is functioning. If only one moves, investigate — you may be blocking humans or missing bots.
Core detection signals that prove mitigation is active
BotRefund uses 106 independent checks grouped into browser, network, device, and behavior categories. Each check adds one objective fact; the AI prediction engine weighs the complete pattern instead of trusting a raw rule. The following signals are observable in your own logs when mitigation is live:
- Click behavior — Ghost click detection: catches click activity that happens without the natural sequence of human intent.
- Trap behavior — Honeypot trap interactions: watches for bots that respond to hidden or intentionally deceptive page elements.
- Pointer behavior — Robotic linear mouse movements: flags unnaturally straight pointer paths that rarely appear in real user sessions.
- Motion behavior — Absence of humanlike mouse tremor: looks for the tiny imperfections and jitter typical of human movement.
- Speed behavior — Superhuman input speed (<1ms): identifies interactions that happen faster than a person could realistically perform.
- Path behavior — Grid‑aligned movement patterns: detects movement that snaps to precise lines or blocks instead of natural curves.
- Engagement behavior — Absence of clicks or scrolling: highlights sessions that stay too static to match a real browsing journey.
- Session behavior — Unnatural session durations: catches visit lengths that are too short, too long, or too uniform to be human.
When these signals appear in your audit logs with consistent timestamps and correlated IP or session IDs, the mitigation layer is actively classifying traffic.
Building a readiness checklist for your network
- Instrument the client side. Deploy a lightweight script that collects browser fingerprint, canvas, font, audio, and GPU data on every paid landing page. BotRefund’s Empty Font Canvas check is one example: it looks for a mismatch that a real browsing session does not normally create.
- Enable behavior telemetry. Capture mouse path, click timing, scroll depth, and session length. The script should flag superhuman speed (<1ms), linear paths, missing tremor, and static sessions.
- Correlate with network context. Join client‑side signals with CDN/WAF logs: IP reputation, ASN, proxy/VPN flags, request rate, and geographic consistency.
- Set a baseline. Run the script in monitor‑only mode for 7–14 days. Record the distribution of each signal for known human traffic (e.g., logged‑in customers).
- Define decision thresholds. For each signal, choose a threshold that separates the baseline human cluster from the automated cluster. Keep thresholds conservative; the AI model will re‑weight them.
- Activate enforcement. Route flagged sessions to challenge, log‑only, or block based on risk score. Start with log‑only to verify false‑positive rate.
- Measure the five operational metrics (server load, API latency, suspicious sessions, failed logins, conversions) weekly. Confirm all five move together.
- Schedule a live audit. BotRefund runs a live bot audit of your site on a call and surfaces invalid paid visits with video proof for each session.
Common blind spots in corporate networks
- Privacy tools and corporate proxies can strip or normalize fingerprints, making legitimate traffic look anomalous. BotRefund keeps each signal as evidence — not a verdict — and cross‑checks it against independent browser, network, device, and behavior data.
- Travel and unusual devices produce unexpected hardware/font/audio combinations for genuine people. The AI prediction step weighs the complete pattern instead of trusting a single tell.
- Meta Audience Network fraud often originates from mobile app publishers using automated scripts that click ads in the background. These clicks come from active Facebook accounts, so Meta’s internal filters may mark them valid. Client‑side behavior telemetry (no mouse movement, missing fonts, headless browser) is the only way to prove invalidity.
- Competitor click fraud via residential proxies rotates IPs and mimics human UA strings. Without correlated behavior signals (tremor, scroll, click sequence), network‑only defenses miss them.
How BotRefund’s evidence layer fits in
BotRefund adds three concrete capabilities to the checklist above:
- Live Audit — Identify suspicious paid visits and see why each session was flagged.
- Refund Evidence Dossier — Turn documented invalid clicks into an organized recovery case for Google and Meta billing disputes.
- Pixel Protection — Keep fraudulent sessions from distorting your conversion data and poisoning smart‑bidding algorithms.
The script installs in about one minute, requires no credit card, and starts a free AI audit immediately. Recovery claims can reach back to 2017 for Google Ads spend. Across clients, 83% successfully get a refund, and the approved rate across submitted claims is high.
Limitations and when this checklist does not apply
- If your traffic is entirely internal (no paid ads), the refund‑recovery path is irrelevant; focus on server‑load and login‑rate metrics only.
- If you cannot add client‑side JavaScript (e.g., strict CSP, AMP pages), you lose behavior signals and must rely on network‑layer heuristics, which are less precise.
- Low‑volume sites (<1,000 paid clicks/month) may not generate enough signal density for the AI model to calibrate thresholds reliably.
- Recovery rates vary by traffic quality and available evidence; past performance does not guarantee future refunds.
Key facts
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Independent detection checks | 106 | S1 |
| AI prediction accuracy | 99% | S1 |
| Bot click share of Google/Meta ad budget | Up to 20% | S2 |
| Customer refund success rate | 83% | S2 |
| Refund approval rate across claims | High (approved rate) | S2 |
| Setup time | About 1 minute | S2 |
| Historical refund reach | Back to 2017 | S2 |
| Detection categories | Click, Trap, Pointer, Motion, Speed, Path, Engagement, Session | S2, S3, S6, S8 |
FAQ
How quickly will I see the five operational metrics improve?
Most teams see server‑load and API‑latency changes within 24–48 hours of enforcement activation. Suspicious‑session counts and failed‑login rates stabilize within a week. Conversion stability should be verified over at least two full traffic cycles (typically 14 days).
What if my corporate proxy strips the client‑side script?
Work with your network team to allow the script domain and required endpoints. If that’s impossible, you can still use CDN/WAF logs for IP reputation and rate limiting, but you lose the behavior signals that distinguish sophisticated bots from humans.
Can I run the checklist without buying BotRefund?
Yes. The eight behavior signals and the five operational metrics are vendor‑agnostic. You can instrument them with open‑source libraries or custom code. BotRefund automates collection, correlation, AI scoring, and refund‑ready evidence packaging.
How do I prove invalid clicks to Google or Meta?
Export the Refund Evidence Dossier: timestamped session recordings, behavior signal breakdown, IP/ASN context, and correlation with ad click IDs. Submit the dossier through the platform’s billing dispute flow. BotRefund’s team can negotiate on your behalf.
What happens during the live audit call?
BotRefund runs a real‑time scan of your paid landing pages, shows flagged sessions with video replay, explains each signal that triggered, and maps a recovery, protection, and escalation plan tailored to your ad spend tier.
Does the checklist cover affiliate fraud?
Yes. Affiliate fraud often uses the same automated click and traffic patterns. The Trap behavior (honeypot) and Engagement behavior (static sessions) signals are especially effective at catching incentivized or scripted affiliate traffic.
What if my false‑positive rate spikes after enforcement?
Revert to log‑only mode, review the flagged sessions against your human baseline, and adjust thresholds. Privacy tools, travel, and unusual devices are the most common causes. The AI model re‑weights signals automatically as more labeled data accumulates.
Further reading and comparison sources
These external sources provide additional context for evaluating the topic. Their inclusion is not an endorsement.
Learn more
Visit the website for more information.